| In The News: |
Headlines
by Fresh
Content.net
|
| Ads & Sponsors: |
|
| Ads & Sponsors: |
 |
| Ads & Sponsors: |
| Your Ad Here!
|
| Slugger Network: |

|
|
| A PARTY DIVIDED: Democratic Leadership Is Unwinding |
| Tuesday, April 10, 2007 |

THE DEMOCRATIC TAILSPIN IS UNFOLDING
The Associated Press: "Reid Says He'll Try To Cut Off War Funds" (4/2/07)
The Associated Press: "Levin: Senate Will Keep Paying For War" (4/8/07)
Simply unbelievable.... yet so very typical of the leftists in congress. They are starting to crack inside their own political maneuvering. "We're not going to vote to cut funding, period," Levin said. "But what we should do, and we're going to do, is continue to press this president to put some pressure on the Iraqi leaders to reach a political settlement." But the this democratic senator seems to be trumpeting for his party's leadership who has gone on record stating the opposite:
"We're not going to back up one second on this, on this veto threat," said Reid, pointing out that a report last week by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service concluded that the military does not need the new funding until July.
But again Sen. Reid, you have promised already not to cut off funds for the troops; at least that is what you stated upon gaining power as majority leader of the senate.
The Remarks Sen. Reid made on Nov. 30, shortly after Democrats won control of Congress. "We're not going to do anything to limit funding or cut off funds," he said at the time.
.....on the PELOSI FRONT:

An Editorial from the washingtonpost.com
Pratfall in Damascus Nancy Pelosi's foolish shuttle diplomacy
Thursday, April 5, 2007; A16
....here is a clip:
Ms. Pelosi was criticized by President Bush for visiting Damascus at a time when the administration -- rightly or wrongly -- has frozen high-level contacts with Syria. Mr. Bush said that thanks to the speaker's freelancing Mr. Assad was getting mixed messages from the United States. Ms. Pelosi responded by pointing out that Republican congressmen had visited Syria without drawing presidential censure. That's true enough -- but those other congressmen didn't try to introduce a new U.S. diplomatic initiative in the Middle East. "We came in friendship, hope, and determined that the road to Damascus is a road to peace" Ms. Pelosi grandly declared.
Never mind that that statement is ludicrous: As any diplomat with knowledge of the region could have told Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Assad is a corrupt thug whose overriding priority at the moment is not peace with Israel but heading off U.N. charges that he orchestrated the murder of former Lebanese prime minister Rafiq al-Hariri. The really striking development here is the attempt by a Democratic congressional leader to substitute her own foreign policy for that of a sitting Republican president. Two weeks ago Ms. Pelosi rammed legislation through the House of Representatives that would strip Mr. Bush of his authority as commander in chief to manage troop movements in Iraq. Now she is attempting to introduce a new Middle East policy that directly conflicts with that of the president. We have found much to criticize in Mr. Bush's military strategy and regional diplomacy. But Ms. Pelosi's attempt to establish a shadow presidency is not only counterproductive, it is foolish.
Tags: iraq, funding bill, harry reid, nancy pelosi, carl levin, levin, democrats, associated press, armed forces, iraq, iran, iraq war, operation iraqi freedom, pace, president bushLabels: iraq, News, Politics, War |
posted by DC @ 17:06   |
|
|
|
| IRAN 101 |
| Wednesday, April 04, 2007 |
 Iran's Missile Forces Wikipedia Reference Current Equipment of the Iranian Army Reference
 IRAN'S MILITARY INTEL 101
These forces total about 545,000 personnel. Both fall under the commands of the Ministry's of Defence & Armed Forces Logistics.
* The regular armed forces have an estimated 420,000 personnel: the Islamic Republic of Iran Army, 350,000 personnel; the Islamic Republic of Iran Navy, 18,000 sailors and marines; and the Islamic Republic of Iran Air Force, 52,000 airmen.
SPECIFIC SYSTEMS:
Aircraft upgrades and components
* Iran claims to have upgraded its US-made F-4, F-5, and F-14 fighter jets, and produced spare parts including tires, avionics, and engine components.
Missiles
Medium range (MRBM)
Medium range missiles are considered to have a range between 1000 and 3000 kilometers.
* Shahab-3 - strategic MRBM with a range of 2,100 km. copy of DPRK Nodong-1
Short range (SRBM)
Short range missiles are considered to have a range up to 1000 kilometers.
* Shahab-2 - tactical SRBM with a range of 750 km copy of Soviet SS-1d/Scud-C * Shahab-1 - tactical SRBM with a range of 350 km. copy of Soviet SS-1c/Scud-B * Fateh-110 - single-stage solid-propellant SRBM with a range of 200 km * Zelzal-2 - single-stage solid-propellant SRBM with a range of 200 km * Fajr-5 - artillery rocket * Fajr-3 - artillery rocket
Anti-tank missiles
* Raad - copy of Soviet AT-3 Sagger * RPG-7 copy of Soviet RPG-7. Iran is forecast to manufacture 2.88 percent of the worlds RPG-7's by 2014. * Saegheh - improved version of the RPG-7 * Toophan Copy of American TOW missile * Toophan 2 Improved Toophan
Air-Defence
* Misagh-2 - copy of Chinese QW-1 Vanguard with some Chinese upgrades * Misagh-1 - copy of Chinese QW-1 Vanguard * Sayyad-1 - copy of Chinese SA-2 * Fajr-27 - rapid fire cannon

For Official Statistics On Iran Click Here
Iran Military
Military branches: Islamic Republic of Iran regular forces (includes Ground Forces, Navy, Air and Air Defense Forces), Revolutionary Guards (includes Ground, Air, Navy, Qods, and Basij-mobilization-forces), Law Enforcement Forces
Military manpower - military age: 21 years of age
Military manpower - availability: males age 15-49: 18,319,328 (2001 est.)
Military manpower - fit for military service: males age 15-49: 10,872,407 (2001 est.)
Military manpower - reaching military age annually: males: 823,040 (2001 est.)
Military expenditures - dollar figure: $5.787 billion (FY98/99)
Military expenditures - percent of GDP: 2.9% (FY98/99)
HOW AN ATTACK ON IRAN WOULD BE CONDUCTED..
Current US Order of Battle Hot Documents Countdown Timeline
Military Options # Air Strikes # Blockade # OPLAN 1019 # OPLAN 1002 # OPLAN 1004 Iranian Military Power # Iranian Special Weapons Programs [nuclear, chemical, biological, and missile] # Targets - WMD Facilities # Iranian Intelligence and Security Agencies
# CLOUD COVER # Current Weather - Tehran # Current Weather - Esfahan # Current Weather - Arak
CLICK TO CHECK OUT GLOBAL SECURITY'S IRAN ATTACK OPERATION SPECSHOT!
Tags: Iranian Special Weapons Programs, Tehran, Esfahan, Arak, Security, War on iran, war against iran, air strikes, blockade, oplan, iran, iraq, US order of battle, hot documents, documents, law enforcement, air, navy, qods, revolutionary guard, basij-mobilization-forces, basij, islamic republic of iran, bush, blair, britain, captured, fajr-27, nuke, nuclear, iranian surrenderLabels: Bush, Defense, Intel, Iran, War |
posted by DC @ 05:18   |
|
|
|
| Re-Post: "How Can You Support This Iraq War?" |
| Tuesday, April 03, 2007 |
 America, Do We Get Squeemish over War? Wednesday, November 15, 2006
Have we become like many of the nations in western europe? We overwhelmingly support going into combat to fight terrorists and evil dictators like Saddam.. but just a few years later we are sick of it to the point we are willing to forget why we fight.
Many I find on news shows on the television poke fun at the struggle in Iraq and even go as far as to say that our men and women are dying for no reason. The planes struck the twin towers and the pentagon on that Tuesday morning and American flags went up everywhere, on every vehicle beside every home America came together. But day after day following the attacks on our homeland we became more tired of this global war to combat terror. Flags began disappearing off vehicles and houses, democrats began questioning the Bush administration and went as far to make over the wall accusations of conspiracy and deliberate distortion of facts pertaining to the reasons why we went into Iraq. (for more on why the Iraq war is justified refer to my other 2 recent blogs on Saddam).
The media began it's attack; day after day showing carnage in Iraq and deliberately touting any failure on a day to day basis to decry the security situation in the new democratic country of Iraq. More time went by, and Americans, hit by the media's strong propoganda engines such as abc news, cbs and cnn.. began to become demoralized by the idea of keeping our troops in harms way. Americans began to demand change, ignorant of the progress made, they removed the republican party from control in the United States Legislature. Like President Bush said "Democrats care about our security just as much as I do". And I happen to agree with Mr. Bush about the Democrats' patriotism, which I do not question. But I do believe many of them need a dose of reality, realizing that this is a new struggle, a new war and a new enemy. Ever changing tactics and ever changing war strategy. Just remember we needed change in our strategy in Iraq, but as in all wars... changing the party or creating gridlock does not guarantee better security or success on foreign policy.
I like many of the Americans who voted for the democrats believe there are alot of problems in Iraq. But we most always remember the problems do not lie with us. For our troops are the finest, best trained, and most honorable fighters in the history of this world. We face an enemy who cowards in the dark and constantly shifts and we must all know that it is going to take some time to win this war. Just remember if we do pull our troops out, it is not only an insult to our fallen troops and what they fought for, it is in insult upon the very basis of our own democracy. And it would show to the world that America can not stomach the thought of standing up for Freedom, democracy, and Security. If somehow we end up chickening out, we might consider changing our national symbol to something other than an eagle. Like George HW Bush had said when he visited my home state of New Hampshire; "We don't stand there with our head in the sand, Our national symbol is not the Ostrich it's the eagle."
I am so very proud of our country for the high turnout at the polls regardless of the outcome. It shows people are becoming interested again, and realize that they can have a voice in this great country.
God Bless Y'all,
SLUGGER
Labels: Bush, iraq, War |
posted by DC @ 15:36   |
|
|
|
|
|